Lang Road Heritage Conservation Area

Item details

Name of item: Lang Road Heritage Conservation Area
Type of item: Conservation Area
Category: Other - Urban Area
Primary address: Lang Road and 149 -159 Cook Road, Centennial Park, NSW 2021
Parish: Alexandria
County: Cumberland
Local govt. area: Sydney

Boundary:

Lang Road from Moore Park Rd to Cook Rd, including Nos 149-151 to 159 Cook Road.
All addresses
Street AddressSuburb/townLGAParishCountyType
Lang Road and 149 -159 Cook RoadCentennial ParkSydneyAlexandriaCumberlandPrimary Address

Statement of significance:

The Lang Road Conservation Area is of historical significance as being part of lands subdivided from Centennial Park specifically to raise funds for the upgrading of Centennial Park. It is a rare and unusual example of the history of urban development of inner Sydney.

The Conservation Area has aesthetic significance as a coherent high quality residential area with a variety of architectural styles typical of the first quarter of the twentieth century (Federation, inter-war styles) with some modern infusions.The original buildings covenants, the original cost of the blocks and their setting adjacent to parkland, ensured high quality, predominantly architect-designed residences were built. It provides a beneficial urban edge to Centennial Park.
Date significance updated: 17 Jun 21
Note: The State Heritage Inventory provides information about heritage items listed by local and State government agencies. The State Heritage Inventory is continually being updated by local and State agencies as new information becomes available. Read the Department of Premier and Cabinet copyright and disclaimer.

Description

Designer/Maker: Various
Builder/Maker: Various
Construction years: 1905-1925
Physical description: A spatially defined Conservation Area, Lang Road fronting Centennial Park, and some properties fronting Cook Road ( Nos 153 -159). Residences are high quality, large detached brick or stone, primarily one and two storeys, with slate or tile roofs representing a diverse range of architectural styles from the first quarter of the twentieth century. Grand residences are set in large grounds on single or double blocks. Residences are well setback from the street, and elevated with garages usually located off Centennial Lane, the rear lane running parallel to Lang and Cook Roads.

STREET RATINGS:

Centennial Lane: narrow service lane for both Land Road and Cook Road properties, typical of late Victorian subdivision patterns. Characterised by large garages, on the west side, the rear of modern residential flat developments. Street Rating: B

Cook Road - east side only from Nos 149-151 to 159 : wide street partially fronting the former showground. Characterised by some remnants of the earlier Federation era houses to 1920s residences. Street Rating: B

Darvall Street: cross street between Lang & Cook Roads. No properties front the street. Some detracting and neutral development have side elevations to the street. Street Rating: C

Lang Road:Wide street fronting Centennial Park characterised by grand detached residences on large blocks and in garden settings, including a large number of individually listed heritage items. Very few detracting or neutral developments. Substantial street tree planting. Street Rating: A

Mitchell Street: cross street between Lang & Cook Roads. No properties front the street. On Cook Road, detracting developments have side elevations to the street. On Lang Road, the street is flanked by two heritage items. Street Rating: B
Physical condition and/or
Archaeological potential:
Generally good.
Date condition updated:12 Oct 12
Modifications and dates: This area was affected by the 1999 Sydney hailstorm, resulting in extensive replacement of roofing materials. Hasty reroofing following the hailstorm has resulted in many cases in the installation of inappropriate roofing materials, inconsistent roofing materials,, the removal of separate front verandah and/or balcony roofs.
Further information: Under LEP 2012 the boundary of Lang Road Conservation Area has been reduced to exclude those properties fronting Cook Road from Moore Park Road to Nos. 127-147 Cook Road that were included as part of the conservation area under South Sydney LEP 1998. Most of this area that is now excluded contains detracting buildings although there are several significant buildings which are individually heritage listed.

Heritage Inventory sheets are often not comprehensive, and should be regarded as a general guide only.

Inventory sheets are based on information available, and often do not include the social history of sites and buildings. Inventory sheets are constantly updated by the City as further information becomes available. An inventory sheet with little information may simply indicate that there has been no building work done to the item recently: it does not mean that items are not significant. Further research is always recommended as part of preparation of development proposals for heritage items, and is necessary in preparation of Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Management Plans, so that the significance of heritage items can be fully assessed prior to submitting development applications.
Current use: Residential
Former use: Residential, formed part of Sydney Common

History

Historical notes: The "Eora people" was the name given to the coastal Aborigines around Sydney. Central Sydney is therefore often referred to as "Eora Country". Within the City of Sydney local government area, the traditional owners are the Gadigal and Wangal bands of the Eora.

With European Occupation of Sydney region from 1788, the Gadigal and Wangal people were largely decimated but there are descendants still living in Sydney today.
For information about the Aboriginal history of the local area see the City’s Barani website: http://www.sydneybarani.com.au/

In October 1811 Lachlan Macquarie ordered that the area surrounding the Lachlan Swamps should be set aside as a common. 1305 acres was reserved as a place for stock to be grazed where they would not eat the private gardens and parks of Sydney. The prosaically-named Sydney Common reflects the growing sophistication of the convict colony, where at earlier periods a common may have been seen as unnecessary.

In 1825 it had become apparent that Sydney’s water supply was not adequate with the growing population which had led to the Tank Stream becoming unreliable, as well as polluted. The Lachlan Swamps was recommended as the replacement supply and the Busby’s Bore was constructed to supply this water. However, this supply was found to be vulnerable to drought and later on water was piped from the Botany Swamps.

From the 1850s development around the edges of the common happen with the first game of cricket being played at the Garrison Cricket Ground in 1854. This ground was later known as the Sydney Cricket Ground. The Randwick racecourse was established in the area in 1860. In 1869 part of the common area became Moore Park. This area was bigger then it is today because it occupied all the land that Sydney Boys and Sydney Girls high schools are currently occupy. Other neighbours included the Royal Agricultural Society and the Victoria Barracks.

With the development of the racecourse, Moore Park and the showground and the remaining common was ripe for developing. The developing of the Upper Nepean river as a water supply for Sydney meant that the Lachlan Swamps were no longer going to be relied on for water. While Sir Henry Parkes took much of the credit for Centennial Park, despite neither the original idea nor the name coming from him. Frederick Augustus Franklin, a civil engineer approached Lord Carrington, the Governor, and suggested a carriage drive be built around the domain and Botanic Gardens. The Governor thought the idea a good and instructed Franklin to inspect this and other potential sites.

Part of Franklin’s proposals was the suggestion to erect a building such as the late Garden Palace on the most elevated part of the proposed park. Precisely why Sydney needed a grandiose monument was difficult to say. Franklin’s conception was based on the Crystal Palace and its surrounding gardens at Sydenham where he had worked in 1853-1855.

Sir Henry Parkes took this idea further proposing a vast State house to be built on the South Head Road (now Oxford Street) frontage of the park. The building was meant to be symbolic, rather then useful, and it had views to Botany Bay, site of the first landing of the First Fleet. This proposal was vigorously lampooned in press and Parliament. Conceived as a national monument it soon became known as Sir Henry’s dead-house. While the park itself was favourably received the state house was subject of stringent criticism.

The park was to be 640 acres as a minimum (this magical figure being one square mile) and the improvements and state house were to be financed by the sale of building land around the park. In total the park was 763 acres, with another 60 acres in Queen’s Park. This was comfortably larger than the 600-odd acres of Hyde Park/Kensington Gardens, which was then the largest park in London, making Centennial Park one of the largest urban parks anywhere in the world at that time. The surrounding areas, 193 acres in all were to be subdivided and sold as mansion sites. Parkes suggested that the land would fetch up to £10 per foot, and with 20,000 fee of frontage he expected to see about £200,000 raised. Of this we shall want £50,000 for converting the land into a park, and £150,000 for the erection of this national mansion. Mr Trickett thought many of these allotments would realise £20 or £30 a foot, so that, instead of £200,000 the land would fetch £300,000. As Richard Twopeny wrote in 1883 in Town Life in Australia, "this land speculation is quite a feature of Australian life, and at certain periods it is difficult to lose money by it." The cost of building the State House and the park were grossly underestimated. 1894 it was reported that despite the expenditure of £200,000 on the park another £40,000 was necessary to complete the capital works program.

Precisely who had drafted the plan in unclear and the street layouts and block sizes planned for the perimeter lands were very different to the final result. In latter years Frederick Franklin claimed the plan was his and produced a pamphlet containing detailed correspondence to back up his claim for government compensation for all his work.

Between 1887 and 1904 the subdivision pattern was finalised and work finished on the roads and set out of the subdivision. Appropriately, given that the sale of the land was originally earmarked to finance the State house, the streets were given the names of illustrious figures from New South Wales past. Sir Thomas Mitchell, Reverend John Dunmore Lang, Sir James Martin, Captain James Cook, Sir John Darvall and Sir George Dibbs were all honoured with street names. Given Dibbs had been the most vociferous opponent of the scheme, his inclusion seems rather ironic, especially as the street he was given is a short one with no park frontage and with no houses facing it. Sir Henry Parkes already had a road named after him within the park and was not included in the subdivision street naming. In other parts of the subdivision names of surveyors and explorers, such as Govett, Oxley and Flinders were used. Large auctions were held on-site on the 18th and 25th of March 1905, with a supplementary auction of some of the unsold blocks, again on-site, on thee 15th of April.

While a number of blocks were sold at these auctions, the Lang Road frontages with their good views proving particularly popular, much of the subdivision remained unsold. The subdivision was gradually sold off, auctioned a few blocks at a time by Richardson and Wrench. By August 1909 all of the Lang and Cook Road blocks had been sold and the area had been built out by the 1920s.

The houses that were built in Lang Road represented a fine collection of architect designed dwellings. The prosperity of the area is underlined by the large number of garages built at the same time of the houses or shortly afterwards. Most of the houses were for owner occupation.

By the late 1960s the area was coming under increasing pressure. Some of the larger houses in Lang Road had been converted to boarding houses. Under the City Commissioners high rise was permitted in Cook Road. As well as leading to the destruction of much historic housing in Cook Road, this had an adverse impact on surrounding housing. In 1972, Tom Lewis , Minister of Lands and Tourism (later Premier) unveiled plans for a huge sporting complex as part of a bid for the 1988 Olympics. This would have obliterated most of Moore Park, a substantial portion of the south- east corner of Centennial park. It would also have led to the demolitions of the entire Martin Road/Robertson Road area.

A coalition of interest under the banner of "Save the Parks" began to fight the proposal. Months of campaigning (co-ordinated from the Runcie's residence at 2 Martin Road) culminated in a massive meeting in Centennial Park on 18th June 1972. A similar meeting was also held at Sydney Town Hall that evening, and Jack Mundey of BLF announced that the entire proposal was the subject of a Green Ban.

The result of such campaigning was the proposal was abandoned and shortly afterwards Sydney Council overturned the high rise zonings in Cook Road.

Further resident pressure lead to the establishment of the Centennial Park Trust in 1983 to better manage the park.

Historic themes

Australian theme (abbrev)New South Wales themeLocal theme
4. Settlement-Building settlements, towns and cities Accommodation-Activities associated with the provision of accommodation, and particular types of accommodation – does not include architectural styles – use the theme of Creative Endeavour for such activities. Residential-
4. Settlement-Building settlements, towns and cities Towns, suburbs and villages-Activities associated with creating, planning and managing urban functions, landscapes and lifestyles in towns, suburbs and villages Community facilities-

Assessment of significance

SHR Criteria a)
[Historical significance]
Part of the 1905 subdivision of Centennial Park lands intended to fund the landscaping and development of Centennial Park. It is part of a rare and unusual example of the history of urban development of inner Sydney which included a covenant requiring buildings of high value and quality to be constructed that was strictly enforced.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
SHR Criteria b)
[Associative significance]
Associated with a number of prominent early twentieth century architects including Donald Esplin and Byera Hadley.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
SHR Criteria c)
[Aesthetic significance]
A high quality subdivision of predominantly grand residences in a variety of Federation and inter- war architectural styles, many of them designed by architects, on large sites in landscaped settings with those on Lang Road fronting Centennial Park, and affording views to and from this park. The original buildings covenants, the original cost of the blocks and their setting adjacent to parkland, ensured high quality, predominantly architect-designed residences were built. It provides a beneficial urban edge to Centennial Park.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
SHR Criteria d)
[Social significance]
Socially significant for past and present generations due to the prominence of many of the residents and the high profile battle to preserve the area in the 1970s as part of the Green Ban Movement.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
SHR Criteria f)
[Rarity]
Rare due to the quality and setting of the subdivision.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
SHR Criteria g)
[Representativeness]
The conservation area is representative example of a high quality suburban subdivision of the turn of the twentieth century fronting a major parkland. Contains a collection of architectural styles for houses representative of the Federation and inter-war periods.

Meets this criteria at a local level.
Integrity/Intactness: High
Assessment criteria: Items are assessed against the PDF State Heritage Register (SHR) Criteria to determine the level of significance. Refer to the Listings below for the level of statutory protection.

Recommended management:

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 1.Protection of Significance (a) Subdivision - Retain Victorian subdivision pattern - Do not allow amalgamation or subdivision of sites (b) Key Period Significant (Contributory) Development: - Retain one storey Federation/ Inter-war residences - Retain two storey Federation/Inter - war residences - Retain generous scale of residential development - Maintain building alignments, substantial setbacks and garden settings - Retain original fences. - New fences are to be in keeping with style, character and materials of the principal building - Retain form - Retain finishes and details - Reinstate verandahs, balconies, front cast iron palisade fences, lost detail - Protect intact rear lanes - Retain stable buildings and traditional outbuildings of moderate and high integrity - Additions to rear not to exceed ridge height, retain original roof form and be designed to complement original form of the building - Encourage reinstatement of roofing materials and roofing detail lost in 1999 Sydney hailstorm 2.Redevelopment of Non Contributing Sites - Do not allow amalgamation or subdivision of sites - Respect scale and form of contributory development - Respect building line of contributory development - Encourage finishes sympathetic to surrounding contributory development (generally face brick or stone with some discrete render detail) - Encourage contemporary detail - Adhere to generous setbacks and provide generous landscape setting. - Provide sympathetic front fencing of no more than 1.6 metres in height of sympathetic design (not solid) and side fencing in front of the building line of no more than one metre in height, typically timber framed with wire mesh infill panels or, alternatively, low hedging to side boundaries. - Recognise the collective precedent and impact of the proposal - Develop approach for sympathetic new development to enhance existing heritage character and level of detail - Respect the generous scale and complex forms of contributory development - Avoid flat reflective monotonous glazed façades - Avoid visual clutter 3.Enhance Significance of conservation area - Maintain and enhance street planting to unify streetscape - Encourage redevelopment of detracting sites - Encourage appropriate finishes to detracting developments - Provide landscape screening/softening to detracting sites - Remove/Discourage reproduction Victorian, Federation or Inter-war detail in contemporary development 4. Car Parking - Do not allow new car parking access from Lang or Cook Roads - Generally allow parking access from Centennial Lane. - Reduce impact of existing car parking access from street 5. Landscaping - Encourage trees at the end of streets to reinforce landscape vistas and frame views - Encourage trees to screen detracting development - 65 % of each site fronting Lang Road to be set aside for landscaping 6. View Protection - Reinforce street end vistas with street trees - Encourage and develop appropriate distant vistas 7.Heritage Items - Protect Heritage Items within the heritage conservation area 8. Front dormers - Not to compromise the character and significance of existing buildings - Are not be located on facades fronting streets - Only permitted where they are consistent with the style, character and significance of existing buildings - Where permitted, dormer windows: (a) must be in proportion and scale to the roof form; (b) must be a minor intrusions only to the overall mass of the roof 9. Ancillary Structures - Are to be subservient in bulk, scale and footprint to principal building - To be no higher than one storey with an attic - To maintain and reinforce the landscape quality of the site and adjoining properties - To be constructed of materials in style and character with those use on the principal building - Should be located at the rear between the principal building and the rear boundary. Only lych gates to be between the principal building and street-front.

Listings

Heritage ListingListing TitleListing NumberGazette DateGazette NumberGazette Page
Local Environmental PlanSydneyLocal Environmental Plan 2012C714 Dec 12   
Heritage study     

Study details

TitleYearNumberAuthorInspected byGuidelines used
South Sydney Heritage Study1993 Tropman & Tropman Architects  Yes
Martin Road, Centennial Park, Conservation Area Study and Guidelines Report2000 Kemp and Johnson Heritage Consultants and Planning Strategies P/L  Yes

References, internet links & images

TypeAuthorYearTitleInternet Links
WrittenAnita Heiss Aboriginal People and Place, Barani: Indigenous History of Sydney City View detail

Note: internet links may be to web pages, documents or images.

Data source

The information for this entry comes from the following source:
Name: Local Government
Database number: 2421486


Every effort has been made to ensure that information contained in the State Heritage Inventory is correct. If you find any errors or omissions please send your comments to the Database Manager.

All information and pictures on this page are the copyright of Heritage NSW or respective copyright owners.