Stanwell Park (Stanwell Creek) Viaduct

Item details

Name of item: Stanwell Park (Stanwell Creek) Viaduct
Other name/s: Stanwell Park (Stanwell Creek) Underbridge, Stanwell Park Rail Viaduct over Stanwell Creek, Stanwell Park Railway Bridge
Type of item: Built
Group/Collection: Transport - Rail
Category: Railway Bridge/ Viaduct
Primary address: Railway location, Illawarra Line 56.727km Off Railway Cr, 0.75Km Past Station, Stanwell Park, NSW 2508
Local govt. area: Wollongong City

Boundary:

North: 5m beyond rear of abutmentSouth: 5m beyond rear of abutmentEast: RailCorp property boundaryWest: RailCorp property boundary
All addresses
Street AddressSuburb/townLGAParishCountyType
Railway location, Illawarra Line 56.727km Off Railway Cr, 0.75Km Past StationStanwell ParkWollongong City  Primary Address

Owner/s

Organisation NameOwner CategoryDate Ownership Updated
TAHE - Sydney TrainsState Government 
TAHE - Sydney TrainsState Government 
TAHE - Sydney TrainsState Government 

Statement of significance:

The Stanwell Creek underbridge / railway viaduct has historical significance as a major industrial structure completed in 1920 during the duplication / deviation works on the Illawarra railway line. It has an historical association with Commissioner Eddy as an outstanding example of his extensive regrading and duplication works. The viaduct has aesthetic significance as an impressive bridge composed of eight large arches atop tall piers against a dramatic rainforest setting, a local landmark. Probably the tallest brick viaduct in Australia, it is also an excellent representative example of brick arch construction which addresses the challenges of height, slope and curvature. It has considerable technical significance for the difficulties addressed in its construction, and later in its repairs. Its social significance is acknowledged in community, local and state heritage listings.
Date significance updated: 22 Nov 18
Note: The State Heritage Inventory provides information about heritage items listed by local and State government agencies. The State Heritage Inventory is continually being updated by local and State agencies as new information becomes available. Read the Department of Premier and Cabinet copyright and disclaimer.

Description

Designer/Maker: Engineering staff, New South Wales Government Railways
Builder/Maker: N.S.W. Government Railway
Construction years: 1918-1920
Physical description: The Stanwell Park Underbridge (‘the viaduct’) is a double track, eight span, brick-arch railway bridge, 148 m long, with 13 m clear spans between tall, tapered brick piers, completed in 1920. Its highest pier measures 42 m from creek bed to parapet (Godden, Mackay, 1992).

The viaduct is located 76 km south of Sydney’s Central Railway Terminus on the Illawarra line, where spans Stanwell Creek which runs from the Illawarra escarpment though a lush valley of rainforest vegetation. Two tunnels provide its approaches: the Stanwell Park Tunnel (116 m) from the Sydney side, and the Stanwell Creek Tunnel (277 m) from the Wollongong side (Godden Mackay, 1992).

It is built on a continuous curve between the two sides of the Stanwell Park Gorge, on a one in eighty grade falling towards the south (Godden Mackay, 1992).

Each tall pier is capped with seven pier stones which form a platform from which the brick arches spring. The pier stones not only add to the appearance of the structure but are essential aids to scaffolding and are vital to the spread of the load of the arch over the whole of the structure. The eight arches are semi-circular in elevation, composed of bricks laid edge-on. Its abutments are massive masonry and reinforced concrete structures built in a U-shape with the opening towards the cliff. Above the track bed there is a brick and stone parapet wall extending 1.8 metres above the viaduct and running its full length on both sides. (Godden Mackay, 1992). It is said to be the tallest brick viaduct in Australia (Adams, 2005, p21).

The viaduct is visible from the escarpment, from the track levels at both ends and the from the valley floor, both east and west of the structure. Train passengers can gain only a glimpse of the viaduct because of the nature of the track and the curvature of the viaduct (Godden Mackay, 1992).
Physical condition and/or
Archaeological potential:
The bridge is in varying degrees of condition with the following defects: minor to moderate cracking in brick arch soffits, spandrel walls and piers.
Date condition updated:20 Oct 09
Modifications and dates: 1985: some of the brick arches were on the verge of collapse caused by ground movements associated with the escarpment and coal mining. During January 1986, in a carefully controlled operation, engineers broke the viaduct at arch 6, where most movement had taken place by demolishing the arch then tied the two remaining sections back to their respective abutments with tie rods through the springing line of the arches. Consulting engineers Maunsell & Co. believed this operation had never been attempted before anywhere in the world and extreme care was necessary to prevent an uncontrolled release of a force. Concrete abutments were then built on top of the piers on each side of arch 6, to carry three standard SRA steel beams, to hold pre-stressed concrete deck slabs. On these was laid ballast, and then sleepers and rails, and both lines re-opened on 3rd February, 1986 (Godden Mackay, 1992).
1992: repairs began again, one line at a time. The closed track was taken up and all material on top of the arches removed then replaced by concrete with embedded layers of reinforcing mesh. Arch action was essentially eliminated. The track was replaced on a waterproof base and the process repeated for the other track (Godden Mackay, 1992).
Current use: Carries the double track Illawarra Line over Stanwell Creek.
Former use: Nil

History

Historical notes: The first regional railway lines in NSW were inland routes to Bathurst and Goulburn constructed in the 1870s. Coastal railway lines had to traverse large rivers so initially it was less expensive to continue using ships and boats to service coastal settlements. However when seams of good quality coal were discovered in the Illawarra escarpment near Wollongong in the 1860s, Wollongong’s small harbours and rough seas soon proved too unreliable for the loading of colliers. The Illawarra railway south from Sydney to Wollongong became the first coastal line to be built in NSW and was opened in stages progressively southward from Sydney between 1884 and 1893 (Godden Mackay, 1992).

A particularly difficult section of the Illawarra line was crossing the ‘amphitheatre’ or ‘gorge’ around Stanwell Creek because of the 300m high Bald Hill on the north, and the 350m high cliffs on the south. A report written in 1874 proposed three alternative designs, of which the cheapest was chosen - with steep grades, sharp curves, small bridges and many tunnels. The rough terrain meant that this section of line, from Waterfall to Scarborough, was finished over a year later than the line from Scarborough to Wollongong, opening on 3rd October, 1888. This section of the line passed through eight tunnels, including the 1550 m long Otford Tunnel, a notorious single-track bore on a rising grade of 1 in 40 towards Sydney. Traversing this tunnel in a steam train could be unbearably hot and sooty, and it came to be known as the 'most dreaded tunnel on the railways of Australia' (Camberlaid, n.d.) (Godden Mackay, 1992).

Passengers also complained about the transit through the Stanwell Park amphitheatre. Coal traffic was increasing, the tourist attractions of the Illawarra were becoming recognized and rail operators were calling for double lines and better grades to avoid congestion. In 1909, a survey was made to set out a ‘deviation’ from the original railway line between Coalcliff and Otford - to build a replacement line nearby with easier grades and duplicate rails. This plan was approved by NSW Parliament in 1915 and the deviation opened on 10th October, 1920. Its centrepiece was the huge masonry viaduct or railway bridge over Stanwell Creek (Godden Mackay, 1992).

The design of the viaduct at Stanwell Park is similar to others built around that time and the radius of its arches was to a standard pattern. Brick construction was chosen here largely because other materials were unavailable due to World War I - while the state brickworks at Homebush was in full production. It has been estimated that the total number of bricks used in the massive tall piers of the viaduct and its eight arches was around 3 million (SHR listing for Stanwell Park Viaduct). 1920 construction photos and contemporary site observations confirm that the viaduct was soundly constructed and well founded (Yang, 1991).

For over 60 years, the viaduct required only routine maintenance, indicating the quality of its original design and construction. In 1985 damage to the viaduct resulting from massive compressive forces was noticed, possibly generated by mine subsidence. Described as the 'most serious case' of deterioration amongst all the state’s brick railway bridges (Yang, 1991), major remedial works were undertaken in 1986 (see modifications, above). These remedial works saved the viaduct but compromised the integrity of the structure. In 1990 an engineering report identified further options for its treatment. The preferred alternative involved retaining the existing structure, replacing defective elements and widening the deck. The engineers concluded that movement of the two sides of the gorge may have been due to removal of coal pillars in nearby leases. The earth movements are regularly monitored and have reduced. Train traffic is now normal over the viaduct, although a modest restriction in train speed has been laid down (Godden Mackay, 1992).

Comparative analysis – viaducts
There were 123 brick masonry arch bridges reported extant in the NSW railway network in 1991, mostly constructed in the 1920s and 1920s (Yang, 1991). The first railway viaduct in NSW was built at Lewisham in 1855 with large sandstone blocks, which were locally available and allowed for a display of pride in this, the first railway line in the state. By the 1870s surveyors were asked to minimise the use of bridges and culverts. Larger structures built from more expensive materials like iron were only constructed when absolutely necessary (as at Como and Menangle). The Eddy administration, beginning 1891, saw a new policy of duplicating and upgrading all main rail lines out from Sydney with a preference for bridges being designed in brick especially between 1910 and 1924. Hundreds of kilometres of lines in NSW were improved at this time, with the line at Stanwell Park being one of the last to be completed (Godden Mackay, 1992).

There are a number of viaducts similar to Stanwell Park in basic form but none are as high. The brick viaduct at Knapsack Gully between Emu Plains and Glenbrook on the western line also has eight arches, battered piers and a brick parapet with stone footings and coping, and arches built on the standard 13 m diameter with brick spandrels. There are many other small viaducts of four or five arches constructed to this standard design. The Back Creek viaduct at Branxton is a typical example of a five arch viaduct with the abutments having engaged piers. On the western line, bricks were used particularly for the numerous crossings near Tarana such as the Solitary Creek viaduct between Sodwalls and Tarana - another standard design with four arches and no engaged piers which lacks the visual finesse of the larger and later structures. The Mulwaree Ponds viaduct between Marulan and Goulburn on the southern line was built in 1914 adjacent to the old iron truss / brick pier bridge constructed in 1873. The viaduct has 13 arches and is built to a standard design with parapet and engaged piers similar to those at Stanwell Park. However, the piers are insufficiently tall to require battering and the structure lacks the grace of Stanwell Park. On the western line, bricks were used particularly for the numerous crossings of Solitary Creek near Tarana. There are no significant brick bridges or viaducts on the northern lines (Godden Mackay, 1992).

Additional references
Adams, Michael 2005. Little Bulli, the Pioneering of Stanwell Park and Northern Illawarra till the 1860s, Cultural Exchange International, Russell Lea, p21.

Camberlaid, B. n.d. ‘The Notorious Otford Tunnel and the Stanwell Park Deviation,” B Camberlaid, ARHS Bulletin, no.344 6/66.

Yang, Y., Y.C. Loo and R.Best, 1988. ‘Behaviour of Stanwell Park Viaduct, a multispan brick masonry arch system on tall piers,’ Proceedings 8th International Brick/ Block Masonry Conference, Ireland, pp 1759-1767.

Yang, Yan, 1991. ‘Progressive failure analysis of Masonry Arch Bridges,’ PhD thesis, Department of Civil and mining Engineering, University of Wollongong, online at:
https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.au/&httpsredir=1&article=2257&context=theses

Historic themes

Australian theme (abbrev)New South Wales themeLocal theme
3. Economy-Developing local, regional and national economies Transport-Activities associated with the moving of people and goods from one place to another, and systems for the provision of such movements Building the railway network-
8. Culture-Developing cultural institutions and ways of life Creative endeavour-Activities associated with the production and performance of literary, artistic, architectural and other imaginative, interpretive or inventive works; and/or associated with the production and expression of cultural phenomena; and/or environments that have inspired such creative activities. Creating railway landscapes-

Assessment of significance

SHR Criteria a)
[Historical significance]
The Stanwell Creek underbridge / railway viaduct has historical significance as the major engineering structure to emerge from the duplication / deviation works on the Illawarra railway line between Waterfall and Scarborough, 1910-20. It is one of the largest structures remaining from this important phase of the state's infrastructure development. Locally, these works enabled enormous social and commercial benefits to accrue to the Illawarra Region.
SHR Criteria c)
[Aesthetic significance]
The Stanwell Creek underbridge / railway viaduct has aesthetic significance as an impressive bridge composed of eight large brick arches in a railway curve atop tall brick piers that reach more than ten storeys in height above the creek bed. Its aesthetic attributes include its considerable size and its simple but dramatic proportions. The brickwork is fine, showing evidence of polychrome brickwork on the comers of its piers and arches. It sits within a magnificent natural setting which is enhanced by the grand scale of its structure, and by being flanked by tunnels at either end. An important local landmark, it is thought to be the tallest brick viaduct in Australia.
SHR Criteria d)
[Social significance]
The viaduct is a local landmark and its significance is acknowledged in local and state heritage listings. It is also on several community-based heritage lists, including the National trust of Australia (NSW) (as an item of industrial heritage and as part of a landscape conservation area), and was noted as an indicative place with former Australian Heritage Commission’s Register of the National Estate (as a bridge and as part of a conservation area).
SHR Criteria e)
[Research potential]
The Stanwell Creek underbridge / railway viaduct has considerable technical significance for the difficulties addressed in its construction c1920, and later in its repairs 1986-1990. The construction technology involved building on both a gradient and a curve at considerable height. The repairs involved demolishing one of the arches affected by earth movement then tying the two remaining sections back to their respective abutments with tie rods. The fabric of the structure has potential to reveal information about bridge/viaduct technology before steel and concrete became the predominant bridge material in Australia.
SHR Criteria g)
[Representativeness]
The Stanwell Creek underbridge / railway viaduct is an excellent representative example of railway bridge brick arch construction which also addressed the challenges of height, slope and curvature. The viaduct has an historical association with Commissioner Eddy as a representative example of his regrading and duplication works in the rail system close to Sydney.
Integrity/Intactness: Major modifications (mainly internal) and the loss of arch span 6 have compromised the integrity of the viaduct somewhat, though were necessary to save the structure from collapse in the context of earth movements below it.
Assessment criteria: Items are assessed against the PDF State Heritage Register (SHR) Criteria to determine the level of significance. Refer to the Listings below for the level of statutory protection.

Recommended management:

1. Conservation principles: Conserve cultural heritage significance and minimise impacts on heritage values and fabric in accordance with the ‘Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance’. 2. Specialist advice: Seek advice from a qualified heritage specialist during all phases of a proposed project from feasibility, concept and option planning stage; detailed design; heritage approval and assessment; through to construction and finalisation. 3. Documentation: Prepare a Statement of Heritage Impact (SOHI) to assess, minimise and prevent heritage impacts as part of the assessment and approval phase of a project. Prepare a Conservation Management Plan (CMP) prior to proposing major works (such as new additions, change of use or proposed demolition) at all places of State significance and all complex sites of Local significance. 4. Maintenance and repair: Undertake annual inspections and proactive routine maintenance works to conserve heritage fabric in accordance with the ‘Minimum Standards of Maintenance & Repair’. 5. Movable heritage: Retain in situ and care for historic contents, fixtures, fittings, equipment and objects which contribute to cultural heritage significance. Return or reinstate missing features or relocated items where opportunities arise. 6. Aboriginal, archaeology and natural heritage: Consider all aspects of potential heritage significance as part of assessing and minimising potential impacts, including Aboriginal, archaeology and natural heritage. 7. Unidentified heritage items: Heritage inventory sheets do not describe or capture all contributory heritage items within an identified curtilage (such as minor buildings, structures, archaeology, landscape elements, movable heritage and significant interiors and finishes). Ensure heritage advice is sought on all proposed changes within a curtilage to conserve heritage significance. 8. Recording and register update: Record changes at heritage places through adequate project records and archival photography. Notify all changes to the Section 170 Heritage & Conservation Register administrator upon project completion.

Listings

Heritage ListingListing TitleListing NumberGazette DateGazette NumberGazette Page
Heritage Act - s.170 NSW State agency heritage registerRailcorp s.170 Register4801164   

Study details

TitleYearNumberAuthorInspected byGuidelines used
State Rail Authority Heritage Register Study1999SRA164/SRA572State Rail Authority  No
RailCorp Section 170 Register Update2009 Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd  Yes
S170 Heritage & Conservation Register Update2009 Hughes Trueman  Yes

References, internet links & images

TypeAuthorYearTitleInternet Links
WrittenDon Fraser1995Bridges Down Under
WrittenGodden Mackay1992Stanwell Park Viaduct Conservation Plan
WrittenJohn Forsyth Historical Notes for the Illawarra Line. 1960s
WrittenOakes, J.2003Sydney’s Forgotten Illawarra Railways

Note: internet links may be to web pages, documents or images.

rez rez rez rez rez rez
rez rez rez rez rez rez
(Click on thumbnail for full size image and image details)

Data source

The information for this entry comes from the following source:
Name: State Government
Database number: 4801164


Every effort has been made to ensure that information contained in the State Heritage Inventory is correct. If you find any errors or omissions please send your comments to the Database Manager.

All information and pictures on this page are the copyright of Heritage NSW or respective copyright owners.