Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group (under consideration)

Item details

Name of item: Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group (under consideration)
Other name/s: Solitary Creek crossings; Sodwalls rail bridges; Rydal rail underbridges
Type of item: Built
Group/Collection: Transport - Rail
Category: Railway Bridge/ Viaduct
Location: Lat: -33.5163539919431 Long: 150.00687155318
Primary address: Main Western railway, Rydal, NSW 2790
Local govt. area: Lithgow
Local Aboriginal Land Council: Bathurst
Property description
Lot/Volume CodeLot/Volume NumberSection NumberPlan/Folio CodePlan/Folio Number
CROWN LAND    
PART LOT161 DP1174477
PART LOT1111 DP1204224
PART LOT7501 DP1290565

Boundary:

The boundary is the area on which each bridge is located including supports, embankments, track formation and structure and extends for a distance of 20 metres in all directions from the structure or to the lot boundary, whichever is the shorter.
All addresses
Street AddressSuburb/townLGAParishCountyType
Main Western railwayRydalLithgow  Primary Address

Owner/s

Organisation NameOwner CategoryDate Ownership Updated
Transport for NSWState Government 

Statement of significance:

Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group is of State significance as an exceptionally representative grouping of intact railway bridges and viaducts on the Main Western Line. Consisting of 11 bridges constructed and modified in different periods, the group demonstrates the key characteristics of two significant periods of the NSW railways, early expansion and duplication.

Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group has historic and technical significance for containing the first arch bridges to be constructed of brick on the NSW railway network in 1870-1872. These bridges marked a major change and advancement in construction materials for railway engineering and bridge construction in NSW. They illustrate the technical achievement of the many Solitary Creek crossings that extended the Main Western Line to Bathurst. They are also a tangible demonstration of the progression of technical development in railway engineering that occurred along the construction of the Main Western Line, where iron girder, sandstone, brick and wrought iron lattice were progressively used. The group has historic significance as evidence of the development (through establishment of the railway) and further growth (through track duplication) of the NSW railways into the western regions of NSW, contributing to NSW’s economic growth and facilitating the movement of population, goods and new industries such as tourism by rail.

The group has associative values with Engineer-in-Chief of NSW Government Railways John Whitton and marks both his and NSW’s introduction of the large scale use of brick for railway bridge construction. They have State aesthetic values for their distinctive visual qualities that integrate into the pastoral landscape.
Date significance updated: 20 Apr 26
Note: The State Heritage Inventory provides information about heritage items listed by local and State government agencies. The State Heritage Inventory is continually being updated by local and State agencies as new information becomes available. Read the Department of Premier and Cabinet copyright and disclaimer.

Description

Designer/Maker: John Whitton, Engineer-in-Chief, NSW Government Railways
Builder/Maker: Built by engineering staff of NSW Government Railway; Dan Williams, George Blunt
Construction years: 1870-1916
Physical description: Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group comprises 11 separate areas, each consisting of a work and its setting. The works are: seven operational single arch brick bridges, one non-operational single arch brick bridge, one non-operational four arch brick viaduct and two operational double arch single track brick viaducts that connect to sloping creek banks.

Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group was originally constructed in 1870-72 as a group of 16 single-track railway bridges and viaducts crossing over Solitary Creek between Rydal and Sodwalls). These bridges are identified numerically from 1 to 16 (east to west).

A section of the line (that contains bridges 3-6) was taken out of service by the deviation of the track in 1906 and the remaining operational bridges were modified or rebuilt during the duplication of the track between 1910-1915.


Eleven bridges form this listing and are described further below:

Bridges 1 and 2
These two bridges are single arch brick bridges originally built as part of the 1870-72 single track line. Constructed in 1870, they are 9.14m (30 feet) clear span brick arches, with stone coping and strings and brick wing walks.

They were modified in 1910 to give additional width on both sides to carry a double track as part of the Rydal to Sodwalls duplication but retained their 9.14m span during modification. The bricks on the wing walls are of a dark purple tone compared with the lighter brown and red of tones of the brick work on the bridge, suggesting these were added during the 1910 duplication. Both bridges contain portions of the earlier 1870 brick arches because these bridges were built at the point before the 1906 deviation diverted from the original 1870-72 single track railway.

Bridge 3
Bridge 3 is a 9.14m (30 feet) clear span brick semi-circular single arch with shallow brick wing walls and sandstone springing stones. The brick tones are of warm browns and creams. The bridge has decorative features of two lines of sandstone; one along the top for coping and another single string along the parapet on both sides of the bridge. The foundations are set in Portland cement. This single-track bridge became non-operational when this section of the track was replaced by the Sodwalls deviation in 1906.

The bridge retains its original fabric and structure, apart from the removal of the rail sleepers and lines.

Bridge 6
Bridge 6 is a semi-circular four arch brick viaduct with springing stones, stone coping and strings with 30 feet (9.14m) spans. Its brickwork is laid in English bond and is of a red tone. The bridge has decorative features of two lines of sandstone; one along the top for coping and another along the parapet on both sides of the bridge. The foundations are set in Portland cement and the upper portion in limestone mortar. It is the largest of the bridges within the listing but was originally intended to be a smaller structure of two 15 feet culverts. It was constructed as a single-track bridge and became non-operational when the track was deviated.

The bridge retains its original fabric and structure, apart from the removal of the rail sleepers and lines. Small sections of the sandstone coping are missing but there is otherwise minimal damage present. The sandstone springing stones have reduced in size and receded due to weathering.

Bridges 7 and 8
These bridges were originally wrought iron plate web girders 66 feet (20.13m) spans. They were erected on the skew (66 deg, 31 min) and had one opening. The main girders were placed 13 ft (4m) apart and 14 feet 1 inch (4.3m) from centre to centre. The piers, which were all on the skew, are built of brickwork, with stone coping and strings.

The stone coping and string, wingless design and decorative elements of the abutments show strong likeness to the original abutments of the plate iron girder bridges, which indicates that parts of the original 1870-72 bridges were incorporated into modified structures. The two bridges, constructed in 1915, are both brick double arches of clear 9.14m (30 feet) span. The two large symmetrical arches traverse Solitary Creek and sandbanks, and sloping banks rise to meet the large abutments at both ends of the bridge. Sandstone is used for decorative coping and bricks are laid in English bond. The bridges also feature an interesting brick pattern containing one row of sawtooth decorative brick work immediately below the stone string.

Bridges 12 - 16
These bridges were originally a range of four 50 feet (15.24m) span single arch brick underbridges, one double arch 50 feet (15.24m) span brick underbridge, two 60 feet (18.28) span plate web iron girder bridges with brick abutments and one 66 feet (20.13m) span plate web iron girder with brick abutments. When the single track was duplicated in 1910-1915, these bridges were modified or rebuilt as single arch brick bridges ranging in size from 13.1 m (43 feet) clear span to 13.71m (45 feet) clear span with brick wing walls and brick work completed in English Bond. They represent the largest type of single brick arches built during this period - most brick arches ranged from 6.1m (20 feet) to 13.1 (43 feet).


At the time of duplication, the following construction methods were used:

Bridges 12 and 16
These bridges were the original single 50 feet brick arches and new double-line arches were built inside of the original arches with only a small space between the outer curve of the new arch and the inner curve of the original. In this way, the new bridge could be built around the old bridge and portions of it still exist behind the new brickwork. This method prevented the service from being disrupted (Kershaw, No. 259, 1959, 75).

Bridges 13 and 15
The bridges had a new double-line brick arch built underneath them with the outer curve of the new arch sufficiently low enough to clear the underside of the central strengthening girder of the iron span. The iron girders remained in place so that they could be used while the arches were being constructed so that it did not cause delays to traffic.

Bridge 14
Only one arch was built when the line was duplicated. It was constructed inside the old arch on the Bathurst end, the arch on the Sydney end being replaced by an embankment.
Physical condition and/or
Archaeological potential:
Bridges 1-2 - good condition and retain their 1910 fabric and structure.
Bridge 3- 6 - intact in their original condition of a single track brick viaduct. Some minor damage to the stone coping and overgrowth (soil and pasture) have settled on top of the viaducts where the tracks once were. Tracks and rail sleepers have been removed.
Bridges 7-8 and 12-16 - intact in their original form and are in good condition, despite some cracking to the arches on bridge 8. Efflorescence (build-up of mineral -often salt - deposits) is present on some of the bridges particularly on 7 and 15. Bridge 13 contains some damage to individual bricks near the water line.
Date condition updated:20 Apr 26
Modifications and dates: 1872 - The single track railway between Rydal and Sodwalls was completed with 16 railway crossings in the form of bridges and viaducts across Solitary Creek. The section of Rydal to Locke's platform, 19 miles of track, opened.
1892 - strengthening work on plate web girder bridges (Bridges 7, 8, 13 and 15), by insertion of a longitudinal wrought iron plate web girder under the cross girders of each span.
1906 - deviation, Bridges 3-6 bypassed, two new ones built for deviation.
1910 - Bridges 1 & 2 modified for duplication.
1914-15 - Bridges 7-16 modified for duplication.
c. 1980s - small modifications made to bridges 9, 10 and 11.
c.1990s - The Main Western Line was modified back to one single railway track.
Current use: Aboriginal land; operational railway, non-operational viaduct, farmland.
Former use: Aboriginal land

History

Historical notes: STATEMENT OF COUNTRY
Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group are located east of Lithgow within Wiradjuri country and immediately adjacent to Dharug country (AIATSIS, 2016). The Wiradjuri are the people of the three rivers - the Wambuul (Macquarie), the Kalari (Lachlan) and the Murumbidjeri (Murrumbidgee). Wiradjuri Country covers a significant part of regional NSW, being the largest Nation geographically in NSW and connected through a shared language and beliefs.

There were two Aboriginal language groups in the Lithgow region, the Wiradjuri who were predominantly to the north and west and the Gundungurra (or Gandangara) who were predominantly to the south and east. The areas of Rydal and Tarana contained abundant sources of water through its river and creeks and its high peaks places for vantage points and ceremonies. Artefacts and early journals detailing the use of existing Aboriginal pathways both illustrate the Wiradjuri's movement throughout the area and connection to country (Unearthed, 2023). Rydal was part of a broader landscape in which the conflict known as the Bathurst Wars occurred in post-contact times, and the tradition of Wiradjuri resistance forms a significant part of enduring memory and stories in the region (Gapps, 2021).

EARLY RYDAL AND REGION
Some of the earliest contact between the Wiradjuri and colonists in the Lithgow area came in May 1813 when Blaxland, Lawson and Wentworth crossed into Wiradjuri land at Hartley. From 1814, land grants were issued in the region, dispossessing the Wiradjuri inhabitants and leading to conflict. Governor Brisbane declared martial law on 14 August 1824 in the broader Bathurst region, encompassing the area between Rydal and Sodwalls, and a military campaign was launched against the Wiradjuri with at least 100 deaths (National Museum of Australia, 2022; Lithgow Thematic Study, 2000).

The village of Solitary Creek was laid out in 1843 but the settlement became known as Rydal from the 1860s (Jack, 2000, 78). Rydal was on Surveyor-General Thomas Mitchell's original 1832 line of road to Bathurst.

NSW RAILWAYS EXPANSION
The NSW railway was opened in 1855 with the first section of railway commencing between Sydney and Parramatta. This line was the start of what became known as the Great Western Railway which was extended incrementally westward, reaching Penrith in 1863, Rydal in 1870-2 and Bathurst in 1876 (Rowland, 1954, 262; Chamberlain,1992). The extension of the Great Western Railway allowed for the creation of new settlements and easier transportation of materials to expand pastoralism and subdivide land. For Aboriginal people, the extension of the railway also intensified the impacts of colonial settlement including frontier violence, disease and forced removal from their traditional lands.

The railway expansion was led by John Whitton, the first appointed Engineer in Chief of NSW Government Railways (1856-1890). Whitton was the chief architect of the development of the colony's railway network and his vision and technical leadership laid the foundations for a coherent, robust rail system that had a lasting influence on NSW's economic and regional development (Prescott, 1986, 3). Under Whitton's supervision, the rail system expanded from 37kms in 1856 to 3,495kms in 1899 (Railway Guide of New South Wales, 1879; Lee, 1988, 175). As the railway was extended west over the Blue Mountains and into the Lithgow Valley towards the first major western terminus at Bathurst, Whitton faced financial and political pressure to use inexpensive locally-sourced materials rather than his preferred and more costly imported wrought iron (McKillop, 2009, 22). Whitton utilised local sandstone in the Blue Mountains and Lithgow valley to traverse the formidable natural barriers.There were numerous environmental challenges facing Whitton as the railway was extended. The Blue Mountains was a formidable natural barrier for the next stage of construction and required the innovative engineering solution of the Zig Zag Railway (1867-69) to enable the rail crossing and reach the western areas of the state. The sandstone viaducts of the Zig Zag Railway (1867-69) became emblematic of Whitton's rail achievement.

CONSTRUCTION OF THE RYDAL RAIL BRIDGE AND VIADUCT GROUP
In 1868, the contract for the Rydal to Tarana section of the Great Western Railway was awarded to Dan Williams and George Blunt, with completion initially set for December 1870. However, the complexity of the project, which involved 16 railway bridge crossings of Solitary Creek in 7.2kms, meant construction continued until 31 January 1872. Tthere was also a 17th crossing of Solitary Creek further west down the line near Tarana (Sydney Morning Herald, 1892, 5). The numerous crossings prompted an ambitious bridge-building program commencing in 1869 with 16 brick kilns established in the Rydal area (Sydney Morning Herald, 8 October 1869, 6; Sydney Mail and New South Wales Advertiser, 8 April 1876, 466, Chamberlain, Diary of a Challenge,1992, 41).

While Whitton had used stone to construct railway viaducts along the Main Western Line up to this point, the use of bricks at Rydal marked a major change in the choice of primary construction materials for railway bridges at the time. It predated the establishment of the NSW State brickworks in 1911 and these were the first railway brick arch bridges and viaducts on both this line and in the NSW railway network.

While bricks had not been commonly used as the principal construction material for railway bridges (they were used for abutments and piers) at this point, they met the requirement of being less expensive than imported wrought iron and could be produced at close proximity to construction activity. The original bridges and viaduct at Solitary Creek can be divided into three types: 30 feet (9.14m) span brick arch bridges of single, double and four arches; 50 feet (15.24m) span brick arches bridges of single and double arches; and plate web iron girder bridges and brick abutments of 60 feet (18.28) span and 66 feet (20.13m) span.

Sandstone coping and strings were used as decorative elements and sourced from nearby Mount Lambie with bed stones also sourced locally (Lambie (Report of the Royal Commission, 1886). Construction was completed in 1872 with the opening of the line to Tarana on 1 April 1872 (Rowland, 1954, 262; Lithgow Thematic Study, 2000).

MODIFICATION, DEVIATION AND DUPLICATION
In 1885 the plate web girder bridges were inspected as part of the Royal Commission into Railway Bridges, investigating a suspected 'weakness of Solitary Creek bridges' and aging of the plate web girders (Report of the Royal Commission, 1886, 43.). Cracking in the piers and stone coping had already occurred as a result of the movement of the girders and these had been replaced by brickwork prior to 1886 (Report of the Royal Commission, 1886, 2154-2161). However, the Commission concluded that the only safety issue was the bedding arrangement of the main girders on the abutments.
The Sodwalls (Antonio Creek) deviation, opened in January 1906 and was designed to reduce gradients by introducing a longer, three kilometre looping alignment (Chamberlain, 2010, 237). This deviation bypassed four of the original crossings of Solitary Creek (bridges 3-6) and removed the need for bank engines (used to assist trains climb steep gradients) on the Rydal Bank (Kershaw, 1959, 70).

By the early 20th century, much of the single-track railway network in NSW had reached or approached capacity, particularly along the Main Western Line. A major statewide program of deviations and duplications was undertaken to ease steep gradients and sharp curves while expanding line capacity. This program, largely implemented between 1910 and 1930, relied heavily on brick as the principal construction material due to the high cost of imported steel and a long-standing policy favouring local resources (Road Transport Authority, 2006, 60). The establishment of the State Brickworks at Homebush in 1911 significantly increased brick supply, resulting in the widespread use of brick arch culverts and bridges (Fraser, 49). Consequently, the period became defined by large brick arch structures, particularly for double-track duplications replacing earlier timber or iron bridges, with the Rydal to Sodwalls deviation and duplication marking the beginning of this era of bridge construction.

The duplication of the line between Rydal and Tarana progressed slowly between 1910 and 1916 under Railway Commissioner Tom Richard Johnson due to the number of bridges and culverts that needed widening (Sydney Morning Herald, 12 July 1915, 6; Kershaw, 1959, 69). All operational bridges at Solitary Creek were modified into single or double brick arches with spans ranging from 30 feet (9.14m) to 45 feet (13.71m), with most being 43 feet (Chamberlain, 2010, 239; Kershaw, 1959, 69). Bridge 1-2 were modified in 1910 while bridge 7-16 were rebuilt or modified between 1914-1915 (Evening News, 4 November 1915, 5) . For bridges 12 and 16, the new bridge was built around the old bridge and portions of it still exist behind the new brickwork. This method prevented the service from being disrupted (Kershaw, No. 259, 1959, 75).Bridges had a new double-line brick arch built underneath them with the outer curve of the new arch sufficiently low enough to clear the underside of the central strengthening girder of the iron span. For bridges 13 and 15, the iron girders remained in place so that they could be used while the arches were being constructed so that it did not cause delays to traffic.

The plate web iron girders bridges were rebuilt as double or single brick arches and the main girders were reused to bridge the George's River at Liverpool (Anzac Rifle Range branch) and at an overbridge near Mount Pleasant (Kershaw, 1959, 75). Only two entirely new bridges (bridges 7 and 8) were constructed (Kershaw, No. 259, 1959, 75; Lithgow Heritage Study, 2000) however these bridges either utilised part of or replicated the original design of the existing 1870-1872 plate web iron girder bridge abutments, including the same decorative features and stone strings and coping (Report of the Royal Commission, 1886, 866).

Only the four non-operational bridges (3-6) bypassed by the 1906 deviation remained in their original condition. Of the original 16 crossings of Solitary Creek in this section of the line, 12 were modified and continue to be in use today as operational bridges on the Main Western Line.

Historic themes

Australian theme (abbrev)New South Wales themeLocal theme
3. Economy-Developing local, regional and national economies Transport-Activities associated with the moving of people and goods from one place to another, and systems for the provision of such movements Engineering the public railway system-

Assessment of significance

SHR Criteria a)
[Historical significance]
Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group holds historic significance as an integral component of the original Main Western Railway which enabled vital rail access to inland NSW. It demonstrates the first expansion of the railway into the west of NSW in the 1870s. The western extension of the railway, of which the many underbridge crossings of Solitary Creek were part, was critical in the expansion of pastoralism and settlement in NSW. It facilitated the transportation of materials, goods and people, and its establishment contributed significantly to the economic and social growth of NSW. Its significance is enhanced by its demonstration of a very early use of brick for rail bridge construction in NSW. The non-operational arch bridge and viaduct are two of the very first brick railway bridges in NSW.

The single brick arch bridges constructed between 1910-1916 demonstrate the commencement of a major statewide program of track duplication using bricks on NSW’s railway network, a period known as the ‘era of brick arch construction’ for railways in NSW. The duplication of the railway network marked the second major phase of rail development in NSW and supported ongoing economic, industrial and population growth through increased traffic capacity between Sydney and western NSW.
SHR Criteria b)
[Associative significance]
Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group is of State significance for its association with former Engineer-in-Chief and ‘father’ of the NSW Government Railways, John Whitton. As Engineer-in-Chief (1856-1890), John Whitton was a key contributor during a transformative period of railway building in NSW. Whitton was internationally renowned for overseeing the engineering feat of crossing the Blue Mountains through zig zag approaches and viaducts. His design of 16 rail crossings of Solitary Creek near Rydal within eight kilometres of track is characteristic of Whitton’s bold vision for NSW’s rail network, ensuring the smooth and logical flow of the railway line despite the challenging landscape.

Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group includes the first brick viaduct built in the NSW railway network and marks Whitton’s introduction of bricks as the primary material for railway bridges along the Main Western Line (and within the NSW railway network).
SHR Criteria c)
[Aesthetic significance]
The Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group are of State significance for their distinctive aesthetic qualities as a landmark group of semi-circular arch bridges and viaduct in a pastoral sloping setting that echoes the curves of the arches. This aesthetic quality belies the technically challenging terrain and the innovative engineering required to cross a river so many times in such a condensed area.

Built in 1872, bridges 3 and 6 have State significant technical values as highly intact, very early examples of a brick railway bridge and vidduct in NSW. Bridge 3 is likely to be the earliest brick rail bridge in NSW and bridge 6 would have been constructed not long afterward. They demonstrate the first instance in NSW of a large-scale railway bridge program that used bricks as the primary construction material. Their construction marked a major change and advancement in construction materials within the NSW railway network.

Bridges 1, 2, 7, 8, and 12-16 are of technical significance as a group of finely crafted brick arches that demonstrate NSW railway engineers’ varied responses to the logistical challenges of building infrastructure in rugged terrain including numerous water crossings. They illustrate the many modification methodologies of this period of track duplication and include examples of brick structure enveloping components of earlier bridges, widening of existing brick structures as well as almost total rebuilding.
SHR Criteria g)
[Representativeness]
The Rydal Rail Bridge and Viaduct Group have representative values as a highly intact group of early brick railway bridges and viaduct that demonstrate principal characteristics of two classes of brick railway infrastructure. The group represents both the earliest use of brick for railway bridges and early definitive examples of the transition to the ‘era of brick arch construction’ in NSW.

Constructed in 1872, bridges 3 and 6 characterise all the features of the original Whitton-era structures along the Main Western Railway. They are among the very earliest rail bridges or viaducts constructed entirely of brick in NSW and bridge 3 is likely to be the earliest such bridge. They are State significant as unmodified examples with high integrity.

Constructed or modified between 1910 and 1915, bridges 1, 2, 7, 8, 12 to 16 are a cluster of bridges that illustrate the defining features of early single and double brick arch railway underbridges. Built for track duplication during the state-wide program of railway duplication and deviation in the early 20th century, they possess the key characteristics of single and double brick arch underbridges. These bridges encompass a wide range of modification techniques and are also State significant for demonstrating the key characteristics of those methodologies.
Integrity/Intactness: High integrity; intact. As bridges 3 and 6 were bypassed, they were not modified at the time of track duplication and retain their original fabric and materials. Bridges 1-2, 7-8 and 12-16 were modified at the time of track duplication and retain their 1910-1915 form, where new brick arch bridges were either constructed or brick arches inserted within the existing structure. The track duplication was reversed in the 1990s, reducing the track back to one line, however the bridge structure retains 1910-1915 fabric and materials.

The landscape surrounding the bridges has remained largely unchanged as private farmland since the time of bridge construction.
Assessment criteria: Items are assessed against the PDF State Heritage Register (SHR) Criteria to determine the level of significance. Refer to the Listings below for the level of statutory protection.

Procedures /Exemptions

Section of actDescriptionTitleCommentsAction date
57(2)Exemption to allow workStandard Exemptions HERITAGE ACT 1977

ORDER UNDER SECTION 57(2) TO GRANT STANDARD EXEMPTIONS FROM APPROVAL

I, Penny Sharpe, the Minister for Heritage, on the recommendation of the Heritage Council of New South Wales and under section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977:

revoke the order made on 2 June 2022 and published in the Government Gazette Number 262 of 17 June 2022; and

grant an exemption from section 57(1) of the Act in respect of the engaging in or carrying out the class of activities described in clause 2 Schedule A in such circumstances specified by the relevant standards in clause 2 Schedule A and General Conditions in clause 3 Schedule A.

This Order takes effect on the date it is published in the NSW Government Gazette.

Dated this 29th day of October 2025
The Hon Penny Sharpe MLC
Minister for Heritage

For more information on standard exemptions click on the link below.
Nov 7 2025

PDF Standard exemptions for engaging in or carrying out activities / works otherwise prohibited by section 57(1) of the Heritage Act 1977

Listings

Heritage ListingListing TitleListing NumberGazette DateGazette NumberGazette Page
Heritage Act - State Heritage Register 0105302 Apr 99 271546
Heritage Act - s.170 NSW State agency heritage register     

Study details

TitleYearNumberAuthorInspected byGuidelines used
Lithgow City Heritage Study1999 University of Sydney  Yes

References, internet links & images

TypeAuthorYearTitleInternet Links
Written 1886Railway Bridges Inquiry Commission - Report of the Royal Commission, appointed on 22 April 1884
WrittenChamberlain, Denis2010Railway West Chronicles: Penrith to Orange
WrittenExtent Heritage Pty Ltd2017Bathurst Regional Local Government Area Aboriginal Heritage Study
WrittenFraser, Don1995Bridges Down Under: The History of Railway Underbridges in New South Wales
WrittenGoldney, David C. and Bowie, I. J. S., (eds.)1987NSW Scenic and Scientific Survey of the Central Western Region: A Report to the Australian Heritage Commission
WrittenGunn, John1989Along Parallel Lines: A History of the Railways of New South Wales
WrittenJack, Ian1991'Railways: An Archaeological Perspective,' in Australia ICOMOS Railway Heritage Conference Papers
WrittenKershaw, K. W.1959'The Railway Crossing of the Blue Mountains, 9, Wallerawang to Bathurst,'
WrittenLee, Robert1988The Greatest Public Works: The New South Wales Railways, 1848-1889
WrittenMcKillop, Robert2009Thematic History of the NSW Railways
WrittenPrescott, A. M.1986Railway Structures of Heritage Significance: A Preliminary Register
WrittenRoad Transport Authority2006Bridges Types in New South Wales: Historical Overview View detail
WrittenRowland, E. C.1954'The Story of the New South Wales Railways,'
WrittenSharp, Stuart1984A Survey of Railway Structures Summary Report
WrittenSharp, Stuart1982The Railway Stations of New South Wales 1855-1980
WrittenSingleton, C. C.1976John Whitton 1820-1898 View detail
WrittenSingleton, C. C. and Wylie, R. F.1959'The Railway Crossing of the Blue Mountains, 8 Bowenfels to Wallerawang,'
WrittenTony Stening: Unearthed Archaeology and Heritage2023Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment and Report: Bathurst Health Service Redevelopment Project

Note: internet links may be to web pages, documents or images.

rez
(Click on thumbnail for full size image and image details)

Data source

The information for this entry comes from the following source:
Name: Heritage NSW
Database number: 5012212
File number: EF14/4893


Every effort has been made to ensure that information contained in the State Heritage Inventory is correct. If you find any errors or omissions please send your comments to the Database Manager.

All information and pictures on this page are the copyright of Heritage NSW or respective copyright owners.