BHP Administration Precinct

Item details

Name of item: BHP Administration Precinct
Other name/s: Newcastle Steelworks, BHP Newcastle, Intertrade
Type of item: Complex / Group
Group/Collection: Manufacturing and Processing
Category: Industrial Office/Admin Building
Primary address: 99 Selwyn Street, Mayfield North, NSW 2304
Parish: Newcastle
County: Northumberland
Local govt. area: Newcastle
Local Aboriginal Land Council: Awabakal
Property description
Lot/Volume CodeLot/Volume NumberSection NumberPlan/Folio CodePlan/Folio Number
PART LOT332 DP1176879

Boundary:

The curtilage is non-contiguous, comprising: -The eastern portion of the curtilage is bound by Administration Drive to the north and west, Selwyn Street to the south, and a fence line to the east. This portion includes the administration building and landscaping, along with the bike shed and large moveable heritage items. -The western portion of the curtilage is bound in the north by Administration Drive, in the south by Selwyn Street and the fence line, in the west by both Industrial Drive and the fence line and in the east by the fence line. This portion includes the roll shop and memorials along with their setting.
All addresses
Street AddressSuburb/townLGAParishCountyType
99 Selwyn StreetMayfield NorthNewcastleNewcastleNorthumberlandPrimary Address

Statement of significance:

The Newcastle BHP Administration Precinct (the Precinct) is of State heritage significance as a tangible demonstration of the process of the 20th century industrialisation of NSW. The Precinct showcases architectural and technological expertise and innovation and reflects the contribution of BHP to the NSW economy.

The Precinct is significant for its associations with BHP as well as key figures such as Guillaume Delprat, and the architects responsible for the administration building’s distinctive design, including Ross and Rowe. The buildings exemplify the typology of industrial heritage in the 20th century, and the administration building is an excellent example of its style. The administration building was the face of BHP and provides a connection to the crucial role the company played in Newcastle's growth, especially during the early to mid-20th century, and its importance to the region’s industrial and economic development, and that of the Australian steelmaking industry.

From the completion of the administration building in 1920 to the closure of the steelworks, the Precinct was central to the site's development, demonstrated adaption to technological advancements and innovation and mirrored BHP's growth. The memorials constructed in 1999 and 2015 are significant as evidence of the enduring value of the Precinct to former workers, whose contributions were vital to the economic growth of NSW, as well as their families and the broader community. The moveable heritage collection at the site is also of State significance for its ability to provide a tangible connection to the evolution of operations and technological advancements associated with the steelworks.
Date significance updated: 13 Nov 25
Note: The State Heritage Inventory provides information about heritage items listed by local and State government agencies. The State Heritage Inventory is continually being updated by local and State agencies as new information becomes available. Read the Department of Premier and Cabinet copyright and disclaimer.

Description

Designer/Maker: BHP Pty Ltd, Ross & Rowe, Stephenson and Turner
Builder/Maker: BHP Pty Ltd
Construction years: 1920-2015
Physical description: The BHP Administration Precinct is a precinct comprising the former administration building, roll shop, Newcastle Steelworks Memorial, Muster Point Memorial, and items of moveable heritage associated with the Newcastle Steelworks.


The BHP Administration Precinct in Newcastle developed around the administration building, constructed from 1920 to support the operation of the Newcastle Steelworks. The administration building is a large and imposing building designed in the inter-war Georgian revival style with clear American influences. The grand proportions and detailing of the building make a statement about the company's prestige and its connections to the American model of steel making technology and manufacture. The original north facing building was extended in 1935 and 1939 and an additional wing on the southeast of the building was added in 1963 to house expanded computing facilities. Immediately to the east of the administration building is a large bicycle shed that housed the workers bicycles and surrounding the building to the south and west is a large asphalt car park. The space to the north of the administration building (the primary facade) comprises a formal, landscaped entrance with a curved driveway.

On the western side of the Precinct is the c.1961 roll shop. This was built to provide and maintain rolls for the rolling mills and is a large steel frame, iron clad structure with brick offices attached to the eastern facade. It is the only structure within the precinct that relates to the steel production process. It retains steel gantries and other fixtures associated with its former use.

In the south west of the Precinct, nestled amongst trees, are two memorials. The earliest of these is the 1999 Muster Point Monument designed by artist Julie Squires in consultation with BHP employees. The large steel sculpture depicts various stages of the steel making process. Inside the sculpture in centre place is a cast bronze pair of welding gloves which symbolises the end of work at the steelworks. The second memorial is dedicated to all those workers who lost their lives at the steelworks and for all 20,000 workers who worked at the steelworks between 1915 and 1999. The memorial comprises eight bowing figures in a circle around two rolled steel bars, bound with a brass band inscribed ' in memory of the men and women of steel who lost their lives working at this site may they rest in peace'. To the north of the circle is a steel bloom containing a time capsule set in place on 2 June 2015.

The site also contains various moveable heritage items as part of a collection which, taken together, demonstrates the key functions and history of the steelworks. This includes original furniture within the administration building, plaques, trophies, drawings and large mechanical plant and machinery elements.
Physical condition and/or
Archaeological potential:
The buildings which comprise the site have been modified over time. The administration building is the most intact, although it has experienced various phases of expansion and internal modification. The administration building is in generally poor condition and requires work to prevent further dilapidation through water ingress.

The roll shop is in fair condition, and retains its gantry structures, associated with steel manufacturing, as well as the tracks for rolling stock although these have been modified.

The memorials were intended to be exposed to the elements and remain in good condition


ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL:

The BHP Administration Precinct is documented to have historically contained evidence of Aboriginal habitation and occupation, since removed. There is potential that further evidence could occur in a sub-surface capacity at the property, below or within reclamation fills (which consisted of dredged swamp and mudflat sands) however further research would be required to refine this potential. The broader area of former BHP landholdings has been subject to several archaeological assessments. Most of these assessments have focused on potential industrial archaeological resources and have not identified Aboriginal objects.

The historical development of the site includes residential subdivisions in the early 19th century, followed by the acquisition of the area by the Sydney Soap and Candle Factory in 1886. The remains of the soap works are not anticipated to be located within the site, however remains of ancillary structures associated with the soap works could occur.
Date condition updated:14 Apr 25
Modifications and dates: BHP Administration Building 1920-1921
Major extensions to Administration Building 1935-1939
Roll Shop constructed 1961
Extensions to Administration Building 1963
Bike shed 1954-1966
Muster Point Monument created 1999
Newcastle Steelworkers Monument 2015
Current use: All buildings are currently not in use.
Former use: Administrative centre for BHP Newcastle Steelworks

History

Historical notes: STATEMENT OF COUNTRY

The BHP Administration Precinct is within the traditional land and sea Country of the Awabakal people (AIATSIS). This area is also associated with the Worimi people whose lands lie across the Coquun (Hunter River). Located on the southern bank of the Coquun, the BHP site was originally swampland with interspersed mangroves, providing aquatic and terrestrial resources. Evidence of habitation in the area is documented, with reports from the BHP Survey Department in 1925 noting 'near the Administration Offices of the steelworks, a deposit of much disintegrated shells with black earth' (Cooksey, D. F., 1925). Cooksey went on to collect stone artefacts from the Mayfield area, including from within the BHP Administration Precinct (UON, undated).

The 19th century industrialisation of Newcastle was a continuation of tradition, with the Awabakal noted as proficient manufacturers (Maynard, J. 2001). The early colonists had a devastating impact on the Awabakal population through persecution and the spread of disease, resulting in population decline. However, the establishment of industry provided employment opportunities, attracting Aboriginal workers to the area. As a result of the opportunities provided at BHP, noted to offer equal wages to Aboriginal workers, and at other industrial sites, the Aboriginal population in the Newcastle area expanded and Newcastle became known as a place of less overt racism, with industrial employment in Newcastle a more attractive alternative to life in missions (Maynard, J. 2001).

History
INDUSTRIAL NEWCASTLE

Newcastle was the birthplace of industry and mining in NSW, with the discovery of easily accessible coal around Nobbys Head in 1797. By 1799 the first coal ship left, with Australia's first commodity export onboard. Prior to this, the Awabakal are known to have used coal (nikkin) in fires, with coal also featuring in Awabakal dreaming stories (Sherwin, M. 2013). Through the 19th and 20th centuries, Newcastle expanded as a mining city. By the turn of the 20th century the population of Newcastle had reached 50,000, however by 1906 an economic downturn hit and with it the population declined, as miners followed work to places like Cessnock and Kurri Kurri. With the decline came the need to consider alternative industries (NBRS, 2021).

THE BROKEN HILL PROPRIETARY COMPANY (BHP)

BHP began mining lead and silver in Broken Hill. The BHP silver mines in Broken Hill were established following the identification of silver chloride seams in weathered rock by Aboriginal man Harry Campbell, part of the early BHP workforce (BHP, 1985). In 1896, BHP purchased 10 hectares of land from the Waratah Coal Company, who had operated to the north of the current subject site. The plan to develop the Newcastle site into a new iron and steelworks was developed in 1911, when then General Manager Guillaume Delprat noted the reserves of ore at Broken Hill were depleting. Delprat was an internationally recognised metallurgist, who moved to Australia in 1898 after being appointed as Assistant General Manager of BHP by Chairman Edward Wigg. By April 1899, he was appointed as General Manager. While holding this position, Delprat developed the flotation process of ore separation which 'revolutionised the treatment of certain types of ore' (The Advertiser, 1937). In 1911, Delprat toured Europe and America seeking advice and ideas on establishing a steelwork site in Newcastle. Impressed by the North American technical and managerial approach to the business, Delprat recruited Pennsylvania Steel Company engineer, David Baker, who drew up plans for the site in 1912 including a building for administrative staff.

NEWCASTLE STEELWORKS

The Steelworks opened in 1915, 2 years after construction commenced (BHP, 1928). It was a major contributor to the economy of NSW, along with providing materials for war efforts and for major construction projects. By 1928, they employed 4,700 men directly, with a weekly wage bill of 27,000 pounds, producing 335,000 tons of product annually (BHP, 1928). Despite a minor dip in production during the Depression, the steelworks would supply 10,500 tons of steel for the Harbour Bridge in 1932, and during World War II would be a major supplier of pig iron, steel ingots and alloy steel (NBRS, 2021).

The construction of the administrative office was not an initial priority. However, by 1921 an administrative building designed by Sydney Architects Ross and Rowe was constructed, overlooking the steelworks. The building comprised a central northwest facing core with two wings. In 1927 a bike shed was constructed at the request of the Safety Department (BHP, 1928). A 1928 plan shows the administration offices standing alone in what is now the administration precinct of the steelworks (BHP, 1928). In 1930 a bike shed is shown to the north of Crebert Street. Historical imagery demonstrates that the extant bike shed was constructed between 1966-1974 (Historical Aerial Imagery Viewer).

By the early 1930s the administration building was no longer adequate to support the expanding steelworks and extensions were required. The extensions and a major upgrade were commenced in 1935 and completed in 1939, designed by local architects Pitt and Merewether. The additions included extensions to the east and west wings with a new southern wing enclosing the internal courtyard, all in a modified Italian renaissance finish with brick and cement dressing. Constructed by Baker and Lamb (locals), the extension doubled the size and provided executive offices along with a new staff dining room and kitchen (Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners Advocate, 23 November 1935).

EXPANSION OF OPERATIONS

In 1954, the administrative building stood alone at the south of the steelworks, but by 1961 this would change. The introduction of innovative Basic Oxygen Steelmaking (BOS) required the expansion of facilities. The central control laboratory, also known as the quality control laboratory, designed by Stephenson and Turner, was constructed to the west of the administration building. The roll shop was also opened in the same year. In 1962, the administration building was extended with more advanced computing facilities installed. By 1964, the Steelworks was at peak capacity employing 11,558 workers and Newcastle was colloquially known as 'Steel City'. The workforce was diverse, with World War II migrants being placed at the steelworks for employment, a policy that was initially controversial (Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners' Advocate, 1949). General offices were constructed to support the expanded operation in 1966, and in 1970 a new IT building was constructed to house the two Control Data Corporation CDC 3300 computers (NBRS, 2021). BHP were early adopters of computer technology, at the cutting edge of the digital transformation.

WIND DOWN AND CLOSURE

By 1982, imported steel flooded the market and operations were scaled down at the site. Increased reliance on computers saw the expansion of the IT building in 1984 to allow for the installation of IBM computers. By the end of the 1990s, the closure of the steelworks loomed. In 1997 the front end operations were closed, and workers were advised that the whole operation would close in 1999. There was significant anxiety amongst the workforce as to what their future employment prospects would hold, as well as concern amongst workers and residents of Newcastle generally as to how Newcastle would be defined without the Steelworks. The Workers Cultural Action Committee (WCAC) was contracted by BHP to be involved in various projects intended to celebrate the culture of the Steelworks and its impact on the community of Newcastle as part of an eight day event. The Muster Point monument was one of the WCAC projects, and artist in residence Julie Squires spent eighteen months working alongside BHP employees to create the piece, designed to reflect a range of aspects of working life in the steelworks (Newcastle Industrial Heritage Association). The Muster Point monument was installed in 1999, and in September of the same year the Steelworks closed. While demolition and remediation of much of the industrial portion of the site was undertaken, the Administration Precinct remained and was transferred to Government ownership in 2000.

In 2011 the Newcastle Industrial Heritage Association, following a fundraising appeal, issued a request for expressions of interest for artists in the design, development and installation of a memorial to steelworkers who had lost their lives within the Newcastle steelworks industry between 1915 and 1999. Will Maguire was commissioned in 2014 to create his design, and the memorial was subsequently opened in 2015 along with a time capsule. Remediation works were undertaken on the non-administrative portion of the former steelworks site and during this, the roll shop was utilised by Daracon Group. The administration building has hosted several small business offices and a men's shed (NBRS, 2021). The buildings are all currently disused.

Historic themes

Australian theme (abbrev)New South Wales themeLocal theme
3. Economy-Developing local, regional and national economies Industry-Activities associated with the manufacture, production and distribution of goods Manufacturing metals-
5. Working-Working Labour-Activities associated with work practises and organised and unorganised labour Working complex machinery and technologies-
9. Phases of Life-Marking the phases of life Persons-Activities of, and associations with, identifiable individuals, families and communal groups (none)-

Assessment of significance

SHR Criteria a)
[Historical significance]
The BHP Administration Precinct (the Precinct) holds State historic value in the context of the industrial development of NSW. The Precinct was established in association with the BHP Newcastle Steelworks and formed its operational hub, supporting the steelworks to be a major contributor to the industrial and economic growth of the State.

The Precinct demonstrates the increasing industrialization of Australia in the 20th century. It played an important role in Australia’s participation in global trade, manufacturing, and defence industries (particularly during World War II). The expansion of the administration building and precinct parallels the expansion of the steelworks which in turn reflects the growing importance of industry in NSW.

The memorials, including the 1999 ‘Muster Point’ Memorial and the 2015 Steelworkers Memorial are significant for their connection to the workers of the Newcastle Steelworks and their families as well as the broader community, given the role of the steelworks in growing the region. Newcastle was known as the ‘steel city’ because of the BHP steelworks, and the memorials pay tribute to this role.

The historic significance of the Precinct is shown in its ability to provide a connection to 20th century industrialisation and technical innovation, vested in the administration building and the roll shop, as well as the moveable heritage collection, and general layout. The 1999 and 2015 memorials are of State significance for their historical value as embodiments of the worker experience.
SHR Criteria b)
[Associative significance]
The BHP Administration Precinct (the Precinct) is of State significance for its associations with key figures in industrial history and the BHP company. Guillaume Delprat was BHP Newcastle's first General Manager and was instrumental in developing the site. This diversification into steel making at Newcastle secured the evolution of BHP from a mining company in Broken Hill to a global industrial powerhouse. The BHP steelworks, embodied by the Precinct, demonstrates the company’s contribution to the NSW economy and industrialisation across the 20th century.

The administration building is State significant for its association with notable architects, including Ross and Rowe.

The memorials, including the 1999 ‘Muster Point’ Memorial and the 2015 Steelworkers Memorial are of associative significance for their ability to demonstrate the experiences of industrial workers and the human cost of industrialisation.

The associative significance of the Precinct is vested in its general layout and the roll shop which provides a connection to the steelworks industry, as well as the administration building due to its connection to both Ross and Rowe, and the leadership of BHP, and the memorials
SHR Criteria c)
[Aesthetic significance]
The BHP Administration Precinct (the Precinct) is of aesthetic significance not only for the architectural design of its buildings, but also for the activities which occurred at the site. The administration building itself is State significant as an aesthetically distinctive example of the Georgian revival style. The building's monumental scale, symmetry, and classical detailing align with international architectural trends, referencing the designs of American industrial giants with the intention to infer equal prestige for BHP. The Precinct's overall layout and design, including its landscaping and the use of blast furnace slag, contributes to its distinctive visual identity, as well as demonstrating innovation in dealing with industrial waste.

The Precinct holds aesthetic significance as a place of technological innovation and achievement. The BHP Steelworks was at the forefront of technology, demonstrating the shift from traditional iron and steel processes to more modern, technologically advanced methods.

The Precinct is of aesthetic significance at a State level for the administration buildings’ architectural merit, as well as the Precinct’s association with technical innovation in industry, vested in the administration building and its landscaping and extensions, the moveable heritage collection, and general layout.
SHR Criteria g)
[Representativeness]

The BHP Administration Precinct (the Precinct) is representative at a State level for its ability to demonstrate 20th century architecture, as well as the pattern of industrialisation in NSW. The Precinct holds State heritage significance as a group of buildings representing the development of the BHP Newcastle Steelworks, one of two major 20th century steelworks in the state, spanning the period from construction to closure and beyond. The architecture of the Precinct reflects BHP's position as a dominant industrial power.

The representative significance of the Precinct is vested in the administration building which demonstrates the growth of the BHP steelworks.
Integrity/Intactness: Good
Assessment criteria: Items are assessed against the PDF State Heritage Register (SHR) Criteria to determine the level of significance. Refer to the Listings below for the level of statutory protection.

Procedures /Exemptions

Section of actDescriptionTitleCommentsAction date
57(2)Exemption to allow workHeritage Act - Site Specific Exemptions Exemption Order for BHP Administration Precinct listing on the State Heritage Register (SHR 02115) under the Heritage Act 1977

I, Penny Sharpe, the Minister for Heritage, on the recommendation of the Heritage Council of NSW dated 5 August 2025, make the following order under section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977 (the Act) granting an exemption from section 57(1) of the Act in respect of the engaging in or carrying out of any activities described in Schedule C by the owner, manager, mortgagee or lessee (or persons authorised by the owner or manager) of the item described in Schedule A on the land identified in Schedule B.
This Order takes effect on the date it is published in the NSW Government Gazette.


Dated this day of 2025.


The Hon Penny Sharpe MLC
Minister for Heritage

SCHEDULE A
The item known as the BHP Administration Precinct SHR 02115, situated on the land described in Schedule B.

SCHEDULE B
The item known as the BHP Administration Precinct SHR 02115, located as identified on the plan catalogued Heritage Council Plan 3334 in the office of the Heritage Council of NSW.

SCHEDULE C
GENERAL CONDITIONS
These general conditions apply to the use of all the site specific exemptions:
a) If a conservation management plan (CMP) is prepared for the item, it must meet the following conditions:
i. It must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced heritage professional.
ii. It must be prepared in accordance with the requirements for a detailed and best practice CMP as outlined in the Heritage Council of NSW document Statement of best practice for conservation management plans (2021) or any subsequent document prepared to replace or supplement this document.
iii. It must be consistent with the Heritage Council of NSW documents: Guidance on developing a conservation management plan (2021) and Conservation Management Plan checklist (2021) or any subsequent document prepared to replace or supplement this document.
b) Anything done under the site specific exemptions must be carried out by people with knowledge, skills and experience appropriate to the work (some site specific exemptions require suitably qualified and experienced professional advice/ work).
c) The site specific exemptions do not permit the removal of relics or Aboriginal objects. If relics are discovered, work must cease in the affected area and the Heritage Council of NSW must be notified in writing in accordance with section 146 of the Heritage Act 1977. Depending on the nature of the discovery, assessment and an excavation permit may be required prior to the recommencement of work in the affected area. If any Aboriginal objects are discovered, excavation or disturbance is to cease, and Heritage NSW must be notified in accordance with section 89A of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974. Aboriginal object has the same meaning as in the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974.
d) It is an offence to do any of the things listed in section 57(1) of the Heritage Act 1977 without a valid exemption or approval. Activities/ works that do not fit within the exemptions described in this document or the standard exemptions for items listed on the State Heritage Register made under section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977, and published in the NSW Government Gazette, would require a heritage approval under the Heritage Act 1977.
e) The site specific exemptions are self-assessed. It is the responsibility of a proponent to ensure that the proposed activities/ works fall within the site specific exemptions.
f) The proponent is responsible for ensuring that any activities/ works undertaken by them, or with their landowners consent, meet all the required conditions and have all necessary approvals.
g) Proponents must keep records of any activities/ works for auditing and compliance purposes by the Heritage Council of NSW. Where advice of a suitably qualified and experienced professional has been sought, a record of that advice must be kept. Records must be kept in a current readable electronic file or hard copy for a reasonable time.
h) The site specific exemptions under the Heritage Act 1977 are not authorisations, approvals, or exemptions for the activities/ works under any other legislation, Local Government and State Government requirements (including, but not limited to, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974), or construction codes such as the National Construction Code.
i) The site specific exemptions under the Heritage Act 1977 do not constitute satisfaction of the relevant provisions of the National Construction Code for ancillary works. Activities or work undertaken pursuant to a site specific exemption must not, if it relates to an existing building, cause the building to contravene the National Construction Code.
j) In these exemptions, words have the same meaning as in the Heritage Act 1977 or the relevant guidelines, unless otherwise indicated. Where there is an inconsistency between relevant guidelines and these exemptions, these exemptions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency. Where there is an inconsistency between either relevant guidelines or these exemptions and the Heritage Act 1977, the Act will prevail.
k) Where relevant The Heritage Manual (1996, Heritage Office and Department of Urban Affairs and Planning) and The Maintenance Series (1996 republished 2004, NSW Heritage Office and Department of Urban Affairs & Planning) guidelines, or any subsequent documents prepared to replace or supplement these documents, must be complied with then undertaking any activities/works on an item.


EXEMPTION 1: ROAD UPGRADES
Specified activities/ works:
a) All activities associated with the Port to Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) road upgrades to Industrial Drive, George Street and Selwyn Street in accordance with the Review of Environmental Factors, determined July 2024 and modified January 2025.

EXEMPTION 2: MEMORIALS
Specified activities/ works:
a) All activities associated with the excavation and removal of the time capsule located below the 2015 Steelworkers Memorial.

EXEMPTION 3: MOVEABLE HERITAGE
Specified activities/ works:
a) Relocation of moveable heritage items within the curtilage as required, including installation of concrete slabs for the display of moveable heritage items and landscaping including the creation of pathways and installation of outdoor furniture, where this does not impact significant heritage fabric or values.

EXEMPTION 4: ROLL SHOP
Specified activities/ works:
a) Removal and replacement of fixtures, fittings and utilities. This excludes removal of the internal gantry crane, but the side swing cranes may be removed if required for safety reasons in accordance with specialist heritage advice.
b) Internal fit out to adjoining brick office for use, including utility connections, and the removal and replacement of existing fixtures, fittings and utilities.
c) Removal of roller doors at the north and south façade and replacement with larger roller doors where this does not involve removal of entire wall or the internal gantry crane.
d) Removal and/ or remediation of hazardous materials within the roll shop in accordance with the recommendations of the Hazardous Materials Report (EDP, 2025) for the building, to be carried out under guidance of a heritage specialist to minimise impact to significant heritage fabric or values.

EXEMPTION 5: BIKE SHED
Specified activities/ works:
a) Repair, maintenance or removal of the bike shed.


EXEMPTION 6: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
Specified activities/ works:
a) Removal and/ or remediation of hazardous materials within the administration building in accordance with the recommendations of the Hazardous Materials Report (EDP, 2025) for the building, to be carried out under the guidance of a heritage specialist to minimise impact to significant heritage fabric or values.


EXEMPTION 7: INTERNAL ACCESSWAYS AND HARDSTAND
Specified activities/ works:
a) Upgrade and resurfacing of internal accessways and hardstand areas.
b) Realignment of internal accessways where this does not impact significant heritage fabric or values.

EXEMPTION 8: SSI-82049456 ENABLING WORKS
Specified activities/ works:
a) Activities and works associated with underlaying utilities, where this does not involve disturbance or impact to significant heritage fabric and values.
b) Removal and relocation of light poles, where this does not involve disturbance or impact to significant heritage fabric and values.
c) Geotechnical investigations across the site, where this does not involve disturbance or impact to significant heritage fabric and values.
d) Removal of vegetation where this is not within the designated zones of significant landscaping, being the landscaped forecourt to the administration building main entry and the area surrounding the memorials.

EXEMPTION 9: SUBSTATION
Specified activities/ works:
a) Activities and works associated with the installation, repair and maintenance of an electrical substation on the western side of the administration building that are generally in accordance with the plans provided by Power Solutions, Ausgrid reference AN-25040 (30 June 2025).
Oct 31 2025
57(2)Exemption to allow workStandard Exemptions HERITAGE ACT 1977

ORDER UNDER SECTION 57(2) TO GRANT STANDARD EXEMPTIONS FROM APPROVAL

I, Penny Sharpe, the Minister for Heritage, on the recommendation of the Heritage Council of New South Wales and under section 57(2) of the Heritage Act 1977:

revoke the order made on 2 June 2022 and published in the Government Gazette Number 262 of 17 June 2022; and

grant an exemption from section 57(1) of the Act in respect of the engaging in or carrying out the class of activities described in clause 2 Schedule A in such circumstances specified by the relevant standards in clause 2 Schedule A and General Conditions in clause 3 Schedule A.

This Order takes effect on the date it is published in the NSW Government Gazette.

Dated this 29th day of October 2025
The Hon Penny Sharpe MLC
Minister for Heritage

For more information on standard exemptions click on the link below.
Nov 7 2025

PDF Standard exemptions for engaging in or carrying out activities / works otherwise prohibited by section 57(1) of the Heritage Act 1977

Listings

Heritage ListingListing TitleListing NumberGazette DateGazette NumberGazette Page
Heritage Act - State Heritage RegisterBHP Administration Precinct0211531 Oct 25 45211-15
Heritage Act - Under consideration for SHR/IHO listing  15 Feb 16   

References, internet links & images

TypeAuthorYearTitleInternet Links
WrittenBarry M1997Architecture Newcastle
WrittenBHP1985Australians In Company: BHP in its 100th year
WrittenBHP1928Interesting Facts in Connection with the Iron and Steel Works of the Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited, Newcastle, New South Wales.
WrittenCooksey, D. F.1925Stone Age Relics, The B.H.P Recreation Review.
WrittenEJE Architects2013Heritage Impact Statement, Newcastle Port Corporation Proposed Intermodal Facility.
WrittenEJE Artchitects2013Heritage Impact Statement Newcastle Port Corporation Proposed Intermodal Facility
WrittenMaynard, J.2001Muloobinbah (Newcastle) an Aboriginal industrial presence: past and present, Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society, Vol 87, No. 2,
Management PlanNBRS Architecture2021Conservation Management Plan, Intertrade Industrial Park
WrittenNewcastle Morning Herald and Miners' Advocate,1949Migrant Labour Starts at B.H.P
WrittenNewcastle Morning Herald and Miners' Advocate,1935Building and Construction
WrittenSherwin, M.2013The use of coal by Aboriginal people View detail
WrittenThe Canberra Times1989Business and Investment

Note: internet links may be to web pages, documents or images.

rez
(Click on thumbnail for full size image and image details)

Data source

The information for this entry comes from the following source:
Name: Heritage NSW
Database number: 5060925
File number: S90/01087-035


Every effort has been made to ensure that information contained in the State Heritage Inventory is correct. If you find any errors or omissions please send your comments to the Database Manager.

All information and pictures on this page are the copyright of Heritage NSW or respective copyright owners.